Killer Whale Research and Conservation Program 2017 Request for Proposals

Applicant Overview Webinar: June 23, 2017 2:00PM Eastern Time
Full Proposal Due Date:   July 13, 2017 by 11:59PM Eastern Time

OVERVIEW

The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, SeaWorld Entertainment, Inc., Shell Oil Company and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service are pleased to announce continued support for the effective implementation of three key strategies to aid in the recovery of the Southern Resident killer whale (SRKW) Distinct Population Segment and the North Pacific Resident's population.  The program will award up to $900,000 in funds this year for killer whale conservation. The program may also support catalytic projects in other killer whale populations.

Initial conservation strategies for this program include: 

  • Increase prey availability: support projects that increase the health of salmon runs that are a critical part of the Southern Resident population’s diet.
  • Improve habitat quality: support projects that reduce threats to priority killer whale habitat from pollution and contaminants, vessel traffic and noise.
  • Strengthen management through research: support research to improve monitoring of demographics and distribution, health assessments and effectiveness of management interventions.

Further refinement of these strategies and the associated priorities are possible after initial investments are underway and NFWF and its partners can evaluate impact on the focal populations and adapt over time.

GEOGRAPHIC FOCUS

The majority of awarded projects will focus on the habitats used by the Southern Resident killer whale population of the Salish Sea.  Proposals that work in other locations are eligible for funding, but priority will be given to projects focused in the northeastern Pacific Ocean.  Some geographic priorities are specific to the priority strategies and are referenced below for further guidance.  

PROGRAM PRIORITIES

The most competitive projects under the 2017 cycle of the Killer Whale Research and Conservation Program will directly implement projects under the following priority topic areas. Applicants should list which priority area(s) they are targeting in their proposal narrative.  Projects outside of these priority areas or that indirectly influence these topics are still eligible for funding provided they support the goals and priority 1 activities outlined in the Updated Implementation Schedule from the Recovery Plan for Southern Resident Killer Whales (NMFS 2008a) as provided in Appendix A of the 5-Year Review of the plan (2011). Priorities from similar management/conservation plans for other killer whale populations may also be considered.

Increase Prey Availability: Projects under this priority will seek to synthesize existing information, fill data gaps, and evaluate potential effects of salmon harvest and hatchery, and habitat related actions on the prey base of killer whales. The highest priorities for the 2017 cycle are for:

  • Riparian and nearshore habitat restoration projects for Chinook salmon in Puget Sound, the Fraser, Skagit, Columbia, Sacramento, Klamath and other coastal river systems and chum salmon in Puget Sound.  Projects under this priority should reference the relative priority of these actions in an existing conservation planning document (such as an ESA recovery plan). Projects that will be interacting with or manipulating the environment are encouraged to apply for a smaller grant to secure the necessary permits and engineering plans.  Projects that have secured all of the necessary permits are eligible for larger grants.
  • Projects to inform future investment through research and planning activities that will prioritize the conservation actions (including fisheries harvest management where appropriate) to increase salmon runs. Competitive proposals under this category will synthesize existing literature and convene experts (including fisheries managers) where appropriate to identify priority salmon runs critical to the SRKW, estimate the potential impact of specific actions to priority salmon populations where possible, and assist in building a highly focused investment strategy for conservation and capacity of priority salmon runs over a 10-year time horizon. 

Improve Habitat Quality: Projects under this priority will work to identify and reduce tangible land-based and in-water threats to the SRKW population.  There is particular interest in projects that partner and coordinate with existing programs that may not have a SRKW focus but bring other resources and expertise on habitat quality issues to the needs of the population. The highest priority for the 2017 cycle is for:

  • Projects that work to implement priority action items in the Puget Sound Partnership 2016 Action Agenda Implementation Plan that can lead to improved habitat for killer whales.  Competitive projects under this category will build partnerships with existing efforts to address threats of run-off, contaminants and other pollutants that have been identified as a health risk to the SRKW population.

Strengthen Management through Research: Projects under this priority seek to fill critical gaps in knowledge that prevent mitigation of key threats to killer whale populations like the previous two listed categories.  All of the projects under this category should be of the highest priority to population recovery and have a direct applied relevance to management needs.  The most competitive proposals will have a representative of the intended management authority as part of their project team for consultation on what information is needed and in what form to increase management uptake. The highest priorities for the 2017 cycle are for:

  • ​Research on the health status of individual whales, including assessing health in different seasons to determine when and where prey limitation may affect reproduction and survival, full examinations of stranded animals, and links between contaminant levels and health and reproduction.
  • Research to increase knowledge of coastal distribution, habitat use, and prey consumption to inform critical habitat determination, identify any unknown threats, and assess and minimize impacts of ongoing and new coastal activities (i.e., fisheries, alternative energy projects).  There is a particular interest in research to fill these gaps in knowledge for winter habitats.

PROJECT METRICS

To better gauge progress on individual grants and to ensure greater consistency of project data provided by multiple grant projects, the Killer Whale Research and Conservation program has a list of metrics in Easygrants for applicants to choose from for future reporting (see below). We ask that you select the most relevant metrics from this list for your project. Most projects will have at least one metric that will apply but few more than two. If you do not believe an applicable metric has been provided, please contact Michelle Pico (pico@nfwf.org) to discuss acceptable alternatives.

Activity​​​ Recommended Metric Additional Guidance
Outreach/ Education/ Technical Assistance ​#  individuals reached by outreach, training, or technical assistance activities ​Metric notes should clearly state the 'target audience' for which you are trying to train or change behavior through outreach and limit the value to just that audience (not anyone who might see a sign, etc.).  Applicants need to build into their project SOW and budget how this metric will be measured (via surveys, etc.) for the target audience.
B​BMP implementation for nutrient or sediment reduction ​# counties adopting BMPs ​Metric value should ONLY INCLUDE BMPs called for in the Puget Sound Partnership 2016 Action Agenda to reduce pollution in KW habitats and should track when a county has sustainably adopted a BMP county wide (not just a one-time pilot). 
​Riparian restoration ​Miles restored ​Metric value should ONLY INCLUDE restoration work called for in management plans to increase the recovery potential of specific salmon runs referenced in the RFP.
​Management or Governance Planning ​#  management plan activities being implemented ​Metric value should ONLY INCLUDE 'listed actions' and priorities that the project will complete from any of the management or recovery planning documents referenced in the RFP.
​Research ​#  studies completed whose findings are reported to management ​Metric value should ONLY INCLUDE research that is 1) called for in one of the plans referenced in the RFP; 2) is completed within the project period to a point where useful information is available for management decision making; and 3) will be disseminated to management in a way that actively facilitates uptake into the decision-making process (not just published in a journal). Targeted management office should be identified in the notes field and a letter from the office on the proposed relevance of the work is encouraged.
 

ELIGIBILITY

Eligible Entities

  • Eligible applicants include non-profit 501(c) organizations, state and federal government agencies, local governments, municipal governments, Indian tribes, educational institutions, businesses, unincorporated individuals, and international organizations.

Ineligible Uses of Grant Funds 

  • ​NFWF funds and matching contributions may not be used to support political advocacy, fundraising, lobbying, litigation, terrorist activities or Foreign Corrupt Practices Act violations.
  • NFWF funds may not be used to support ongoing efforts to comply with legal requirements, including permit conditions, mitigation and settlement agreements. However, grant funds may be used to support projects that enhance or improve upon existing baseline compliance efforts. 

FUNDING AVAILABILITY 

The Killer Whale Research and Conservation Program anticipates awarding up to $900,000 in funding for grants this year. The majority of awards under this program will fall in the range of $50,000 to $150,000. However upper or lower limits to award size are not specified.  A minimum of a 1:1 match of cash and/or in-kind services is required (federal funds do apply). Projects may extend from one to three years. Additional year funds are not guaranteed to be available in future years to supplement awards made as a result of this review. Selected projects may be required to submit data funded by this program to a public forum and/or present their results through NFWF-sponsored forums.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

All proposals will be screened for relevance, accuracy, completeness and compliance with NFWF and funding source policies. Proposals will then be evaluated based on the extent to which they meet the following criteria.

Program Goals and Priorities  – Project contributes to the Program’s overall habitat and species conservation goals as outlined in the referenced planning documents in the overview and priority sections, and has specific, quantifiable performance metrics to evaluate project success. Project addresses one or more of the program priorities outlined in the Request for Proposal.

Technical Merit – Project is technically sound and feasible, and the proposal sets forth a clear, logical and achievable work plan and timeline. Project engages appropriate technical experts throughout project planning, design and implementation to ensure activities are technically-sound and feasible.

Partnership – An appropriate partnership exists to implement the project and allow for uptake by the appropriate management authority if applicable.  The project is supported by a strong local partnership that leverages additional funds and will sustain it after the life of the grant.

Monitoring – Project includes a plan for monitoring progress toward the biological and socioeconomic goals stated in the proposal (i.e. change in habitat/species population number, % behavior change, lbs. sediment reduced, % of predation).  Monitoring should occur before, during and after the proposed project activities to track project success and adaptively address new challenges and opportunities as they arise. 

Local Impact and Broader Transferability – Project advances an existing conservation plan or strategy with clear steps for uptake and integration by local management authority (if applicable) and/or has potential and plan to transfer lessons learned to other communities.  Preference will be given to applicants that can demonstrate how their data will contribute to the broader conservation community through regional/global/species databases if applicable.

Long-term Sustainability – Project will be maintained to ensure benefits are achieved and sustained over time. This should include how future funding will be secured to implement necessary long-term monitoring and maintenance activities and how this project fits into longer-term investment strategies if applicable.

Communication – Project includes a detailed and targeted communication plan (where applicable) to specific audiences and cites the appropriate qualifications/expertise in the project implementation team.

OTHER

Budget – Costs are allowable, reasonable and budgeted in accordance with NFWF​​’s Budget Instructions cost categories.  Federally-funded projects must be in compliance with OMB Uniform Guidance as applicable (OMB Uniform Guidance).

Procurement – If the applicant chooses to specifically identify proposed Contractor(s) for Services, an award by NFWF to the applicant does not necessarily constitute NFWF’s express written authorization for the applicant to procure such specific services noncompetitively.  When procuring goods and services, NFWF recipients must follow documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable laws and regulations.  

Publicity and Acknowledgement of Support – Award recipients will be required to grant NFWF the right and authority to publicize the project and NFWF’s financial support for the grant in press releases, publications and other public communications.  Recipients may also be asked by NFWF to provide high-resolution (minimum 300 dpi) photographs depicting the project.

Receiving Award Funds – Award payments are primarily reimbursable.  Projects may request funds for reimbursement at any time after completing a signed agreement with NFWF.  A request of an advance of funds must be due to an imminent need of expenditure and must detail how the funds will be used and provide justification and a timeline for expected disbursement of these funds.

Compliance Requirements – Projects selected may be subject to requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act (state and federal), and National Historic Preservation Act.  Documentation of compliance with these regulations must be approved prior to initiating activities that disturb or alter habitat or other features of the project site(s).  Applicants should budget time and resources to obtain the needed approvals.  As may be applicable, successful applicants may be required to comply with additional Federal, state or local requirements and obtain all necessary permits and clearances.

Permits – Successful applicants will be required to provide sufficient documentation that the project expects to receive or has received all necessary permits and clearances to comply with any Federal, state or local requirements.  Where projects involve work in the waters of the United States, NFWF strongly encourages applicants to conduct a permit pre-application meeting with the Army Corps of Engineers prior to submitting their proposal.  In some cases, if a permit pre-application meeting has not been completed, NFWF may require successful applicants to complete such a meeting prior to grant award.

Federal Funding – The availability of federal funds estimated in this solicitation is contingent upon the federal appropriations process. Funding decisions will be made based on level of funding and timing of when it is received by NFWF.

TIMELINE

Dates of activities are subject to change.  Please check the Program page of the NFWF website for the most current dates and information www.nfwf.org/killerwhales

  • Applicant Webinar June 21, 2017, 2:00PM ET
  • Full Proposal Due Date July 13, 2017, 11:59PM ET
  • Review Period August 2017
  • Awards Announced November 2017

WEBINAR

NFWF staff will host a webinar on June 23, 2017 at 2:00 PM Eastern Time. The webinar will provide: additional information about funding priorities; and in-depth review of the proposal narrative and highlighting priority project elements; an overview of the Easygrants portal and application process; tips for submitting competitive proposals; and answers to participant questions. Prospective applicants are strongly encouraged to participate. Webinar participants can register by clicking here​.​

HOW TO APPLY

All application materials must be submitted online through National Fish and Wildlife Foundation’s Easygrants system.

1.  Go to easygrants.nfwf.org to register in our Easygrants online system.  New users to the system will be prompted to register before starting the application (if you already are a registered user, use your existing login).  Enter your applicant information. 

2.  Once on your homepage, click the “Apply for Funding” button and select this RFP’s “Funding Opportunity” from the list of options.

3.  Follow the instructions in Easygrants to complete your application.  Once as application has been started, it may be saved and returned to at a later time for completion and submission.

APPLICATION ASSISTANCE 

A PDF version of this RFP can be downloaded at the Killer Whale Research and Conservation Program home page. 

A Tip Sheet is available for quick reference while you are working through your application. This document can be downloaded here. Additional information to support the application process can be accessed on NFWF's Applicant Information webpage.

For more information or questions about this RFP, please contact: 

Michelle Pico
Pico@nfwf.org 

For issues or assistance with our online Easygrants system, please contact:

Easygrants Helpdesk
Easygrants@nfwf.org
Voicemail:  202-595-2497
Hours:  9:00 am to 5:00 pm ET, Monday-Friday.
Include:  your name, proposal ID #, e-mail address, phone number, program you are applying to, and a description of the issue.​​​​​​​

 

 Related Documents