Southeast Aquatics Fund 2019 Request for Proposals
Full Proposal Due Date: Thursday, August 1, 2019 by 11:59 PM Eastern Time
The southeastern U.S. harbors a diversity of aquatic species unparalleled in the nation. Nearly two thirds of U.S. fish species, over 90% of U.S. mussel species and almost half of the world’s crayfish species call the rivers and streams of this region home1. However, land use changes, habitat fragmentation, declines in water quality and availability, and invasive species introductions have greatly impacted these species. Notably, at-risk aquatic species numbers in this region are increasing and greater than anywhere else in the United States. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service reports that over 270 species in the Southeast Region, the majority of them aquatic, are petitioned or candidates for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
To help protect and enhance habitats for a wide range of aquatic species, the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) is soliciting proposals to restore habitats and improve water quality in targeted river basins and watersheds of the Southeast. The Southeast Aquatics Fundis a competitive grants program that supports watershed-based restoration that will improve the health of these aquatic systems and secure populations of native freshwater aquatic species. By promoting a habitat-based approach a diversity of species benefit, from game species to at-risk species, helping reduce the risk of future listings under the ESA.
The Southeast Aquatics Fund is a public-private partnership with funding provided by USDA Forest Service and Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Southern Company. Approximately $1.2 millionis available in grant funding in 2019, with individual grant awards ranging between $75,000 and $250,000.
Geographic focal areas and funding priorities for the Southeast Aquatics Fund are informed by:
- The Longleaf Forests and Rivers Business Plan which outlines NFWF’s goals and strategies for freshwater habitat restoration and enhancement. A suite of aquatic species were selected as indicators of healthy freshwater habitat in prioritized watersheds, including the bridled and trispot darters, Alabama rainbow, Coosa creekshell, Black Warrior waterdog and flattened musk turtle. The specific watersheds and associated focal species are indicated below.
- The Southeastern Aquatic Biodiversity Conservation Strategy (http://southeastfreshwater.org) completed in 2016 by the University of Georgia River Basin Center and Tennessee Aquarium Conservation Institute. This science-based, systematic assessment identified watersheds critical to southeast aquatic conservation based on the richness, endemism, and imperilment of freshwater fish, mussel, and crayfish species.
- State Wildlife Action Plans, with additional input from regional and state conservation partners.
In 2019, proposals to the Southeast Aquatics Fund will be considered from the following geographies, with priority given to those that align with the Longleaf Forests and Rivers Business Plan:
- The Alabama-Mobile-Tombigbee Basin
Projects will only be considered within the three HUC-8 watersheds listed below. Priority will be given to projects within specific tributary watersheds benefitting focal species where indicated:
- Conasauga (priority tributary: Holly Creek)
- Focal species: Bridled and trispot darter; Villosa mussels (Alabama rainbow, Coosa creekshell)
- Locust Fork
- Focal species: Black Warrior waterdog; flattened musk turtle
- Middle Coosa (priority tributary: Big Canoe Creek)
- Focal species: Trispot darter
Projects will only be considered within the counties highlighted below that correspond to the NRCS Working Lands for Wildlife “Colorado River Mussels Project” geography (https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/plantsanimals/fishwildlife/?cid=nrcseprd1302233). These counties include Austin, Bastrop, Blanco, Brazoria, Brown, Burnet, Caldwell, Coleman, Colorado, Concho, Fayette, Fort Bend, Gillespie, Hays, Kimble, Lampasas, Lee, Llano, Mason, Matagorda, McCulloch, Menard, Mills, Runnels, San Saba, Travis and Wharton counties of Texas. Priority will be given to projects that, in coordination with TX NRCS, provide outreach and technical assistance to private landowners to implement conservation practices that improve water quality, to benefit at-risk mussel species and other species (refer to “Provide Technical Assistance and Outreach” section below in Program Priorities):
Competitive proposals will address the threats facing the species within the above-listed geographies by implementing one or more of the following strategies identified below. Proposals should demonstrate how project activities will advance specific goals and objectives of the Longleaf Forests and Rivers Business Plan and other relevant conservation plans, including, but not limited to, state wildlife action plans, regional watershed management plans, fish habitat partnerships, and federal species recovery plans.
- Agricultural and Forestry Best Management Practices – Support agricultural and forestry practices that reduce nutrient and sediment runoff from the land. These practices may include, but are not limited to, livestock fencing, irrigation retrofits, riparian buffers and vegetative buffers around agricultural ditches, rotational grazing, cover crops, reducing nutrient inputs, and restoring streambanks impacted by erosion. Where appropriate, opportunities to leverage funding through the Farm Bill and other programs to renew or enter into new cost-share contracts will be given priority. (Note: agriculture water efficiency a priority for the ACF Basin.)
- Improve stream crossings – Restore connectivity for fish passage and reduce sedimentation by removing or retrofitting stream barriers and stream crossings (culverts, concrete fords). Preference will be given to projects that remove or retrofit high priority barriers or crossings within watersheds where barrier/crossing surveys and/or assessments are being developed or have been completed with an emphasis on lower cost/high gain methods in locations known to fragment habitat for priority species.
- Restore and Enhance Riparian and In-stream Habitat – In some areas within a watershed, streambank erosion or loss of riparian or in-stream habitat have a large impact on aquatic species and may not otherwise be addressed through agricultural or forestry best management practices. In these areas, wetland, streambank, and instream habitat restoration to support key functions of the watershed and improve native aquatic species populations will be considered. Projects will be prioritized to maximize cost efficiency and conservation outcomes for the target species.
- Provide Technical Assistance and Outreach – Support needed capacity to conduct outreach to private landowners to increase awareness of conservation need, appropriate practices and available cost-share programs to improve water quality/quantity or connectivity. This includes providing technical assistance to develop management plans and guidance on best management practice implementation; and the coordination of stakeholders within the watershed to share information and build consensus around priorities for targeting activities to most effectively and efficiently achieve outcomes. Where appropriate, projects should seek to leverage funding through the Farm Bill and other programs to renew or enter into new cost-share contracts. Proposals must estimate the amount of miles to be restored or enhanced and the number of landowners implementing practices as a result of technical assistance and outreach activities.
- Assessment, Prioritization and Planning – In watersheds where barriers to habitat connectivity are a main factor impacting targeted species and a recent prioritization for barrier removal or enhancement does not exist, support the assessment of barriers and crossings in order to identify which should receive highest priority for removal or retrofitting based on probable gains for target species. Emphasis will be placed on lowest cost/highest gain opportunities, and identifying willing landowners.
To better gauge progress on individual grants and to ensure greater consistency of project data provided by multiple grants, the Southeast Aquatics Fund has a list of metrics in Easygrants for full proposal applicants to choose from for future reporting. We ask that applicants select only the most relevant metrics from this list for their project (all possible program metrics are shown in the table below). If you think an applicable metric has not been provided, please contact Suzanne Sessine (Suzanne.Sessine@nfwf.org) to discuss acceptable alternatives.
|Project Activity||Recommended Metric (as listed in Easygrants)||Additional Guidance|
|Riparian restoration||Miles restored|| Enter the number of miles from this project for which habitat quality has been restored to support/increase target species presence. If there are multiple activities happening at different parts of the stream you can break out in the notes the 'distance' of impact for each activity.|
|Miles of stream under improved management|| Miles of improved management||The number of miles of stream under improved management. Examples of eligible strategies include fencing installed to exclude livestock from streams or rivers, removal or retrofit of stream barriers, establishing or enhancing riparian forest, miles benefiting from crop rotation/cover crops, etc.|
|Number of private landowners enrolled in cost-share or stewardship programs|| # people with changed behavior||The number of private landowners who have entered into new program contracts (including, but not limited to Farm Bill, state or other funding programs) that will implement practices to improve aquatic habitat.|
|Fish passage improvements||Miles of stream opened||Enter the number of stream miles.|
|Fish passage improvements|| # passage barriers rectified||In the notes section of this metric please indicate what type of barrier is being removed (e.g., culvert).|
|Improved irrigation practices (for ACF only)|| CFS of water conserved annually|| Enter the cubic feet per second of water conserved annually.|
|Assessment, Prioritization and Planning||# of studies used to inform management|| Enter the number of assessments completed whose findings will be used to inform and/or prioritize management decisions within a watershed.|
Eligible and Ineligible Entities
- Eligible applicants include non-profit 501(c) organizations, U.S. Federal government agencies, state government agencies, local governments, municipal governments, Indian tribes and educational institutions.
- Ineligible applicants include businesses, unincorporated individuals and international organizations.
Ineligible Uses of Grant Funds
- NFWF funds and matching contributions may not be used to support political advocacy, fundraising, lobbying, litigation, terrorist activities or Foreign Corrupt Practices Act violations.
- NFWF funds may not be used to support ongoing efforts to comply with legal requirements, including permit conditions, mitigation and settlement agreements. However, grant funds may be used to support projects that enhance or improve upon existing baseline compliance efforts.
FUNDING AVAILABILITY AND MATCH
The Southeast Aquatics Fund will award approximately $1.2 million in grants in 2019. Grant awards will range from $75,000 to $250,000, depending on the overall scale of the project. If outside of this range, please contact Suzanne Sessine.
Project Period: Anticipated completion time for funded projects typically will be 24 months following finalization of a grant agreement. Projects may be a discrete part of a longer-term project, provided there are definable outcomes for the proposed phase of the overall effort. The project narrative must include a clear timetable or schedule for project completion.
Project start and end dates should define the period during which all proposed work is accomplished, all requested funds are spent and all matching funds are spent or applied.
Match Requirement: Projects must have a minimum match of 1:1 non-federal cash or in-kind. Larger match ratios and matching fund contributions from a diversity of partners are encouraged and will be more competitive2. Applicants are encouraged to describe federal partner contributions as well in the proposal narrative, although those contributions may not count toward the minimum match.
All proposals will be screened for relevance, accuracy, completeness and compliance with NFWF and funding source policies. Proposals will then be evaluated based on the extent to which they meet the following criteria.
Program Goals and Priorities – Project contributes to the Fund’s overall habitat and species conservation goals, and has specific, quantifiable performance metrics to evaluate project success. Project addresses one or more of the program priorities.
Conservation Plan and Context – The project advances an existing conservation plan or strategy, as outlined in the “Program Priorities” section above. If the project takes place in the Conasauga, Locust Fork or Middle Coosa priority watersheds, the proposal should describe how the project will advance the aquatic species goals and strategies outlined in the Longleaf Forests and Rivers Business Plan.
Technical Merit – Project is technically sound and feasible, and the proposal sets forth a clear, logical and achievable work plan and timeline. Project engages appropriate technical experts throughout project planning, design and implementation to ensure activities are technically-sound and feasible.
Cost-Effectiveness – Project includes a cost-effective budget that balances performance risk and efficient use of funds. Cost-effectiveness evaluation may include, but is not limited to, an assessment of either or both direct and indirect costs in the proposed budget. The federal government has determined that a de minimis 10% indirect rate is an acceptable minimum for organizations without a NICRA, as such NFWF reserves the right to scrutinize ALL proposals with indirect rates above 10% for cost-effectiveness.
Transferability – Project has potential and plan to transfer lessons learned to other communities and/or to be integrated into government programs and policies.
Communication – Project includes a detailed plan to communicate information about the project to appropriate audiences.
Funding Need – Project establishes a clear need for the funds being requested, and demonstrates that activities would not move forward absent funding.
Monitoring – Project includes a plan for monitoring progress during and after the proposed project period to track project success and adaptively address new challenges and opportunities as they arise.
Long-term Sustainability – Project will be maintained to ensure benefits are achieved and sustained over time. This should include how future funding will be secured to implement necessary long-term monitoring and maintenance activities.
Past Success – Applicant has a proven track record of success in implementing conservation practices with specific, measurable results.
Partnership – An appropriate partnership exists to implement the project and the project is supported by a strong local partnership that leverages additional funds and will sustain it after the life of the grant. Identify proposed partners, if known (including potential or contemplated subawards to third party subrecipients of the applicant), the roles they will play in implementing the project, and how this project will build new or enhance existing partnerships. (Note: a project partner is any local community, non-profit organization, tribe, and/or local, state, and federal government agency that contributes to the project in a substantial way and is closely involved in the completion of the project.)
Budget – Costs are allowable, reasonable and budgeted in accordance with NFWF’s Budget Instructions cost categories. Federally-funded projects must be in compliance with OMB Uniform Guidance as applicable.
Matching Contributions – Matching Contributions consist of cash, contributed goods and services, volunteer hours, and/or property raised and spent for the Project during the Period of Performance. Larger match ratios and matching fund contributions from a diversity of partners are encouraged and will be more competitive during application review.
Procurement – If the applicant chooses to specifically identify proposed Contractor(s) for Services, an award by NFWF to the applicant does not constitute NFWF’s express written authorization for the applicant to procure such specific services noncompetitively. When procuring goods and services, NFWF recipients must follow documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable laws and regulations.
Publicity and Acknowledgement of Support – Award recipients will be required to grant NFWF the right and authority to publicize the project and NFWF’s financial support for the grant in press releases, publications and other public communications. Recipients may also be asked by NFWF to provide high-resolution (minimum 300 dpi) photographs depicting the project.
Receiving Award Funds – Award payments are primarily reimbursable. Projects may request funds for reimbursement at any time after completing a signed agreement with NFWF. A request of an advance of funds must be due to an imminent need of expenditure and must detail how the funds will be used and provide justification and a timeline for expected disbursement of these funds.
Compliance Requirements – Projects selected may be subject to requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act, Endangered Species Act (state and federal), and National Historic Preservation Act. Documentation of compliance with these regulations must be approved prior to initiating activities that disturb or alter habitat or other features of the project site(s). Applicants should budget time and resources to obtain the needed approvals. As may be applicable, successful applicants may be required to comply with additional Federal, state or local requirements and obtain all necessary permits and clearances.
Permits – Successful applicants will be required to provide sufficient documentation that the project expects to receive or has received all necessary permits and clearances to comply with any Federal, state or local requirements. Where projects involve work in the waters of the United States, NFWF strongly encourages applicants to conduct a permit pre-application meeting with the Army Corps of Engineers prior to submitting their proposal. In some cases, if a permit pre-application meeting has not been completed, NFWF may require successful applicants to complete such a meeting prior to grant award.
Federal Funding – The availability of federal funds estimated in this solicitation is contingent upon the federal appropriations process. Funding decisions will be made based on level of funding and timing of when it is received by NFWF.
Dates of activities are subject to change. Please check the Southeast Aquatics Fund page of the NFWF website for the most current dates and information.
Full Proposal Due Date
|Thursday, August 1st 2019, 11:59 pm ET|
|August – October 2019|
| November 2019|
HOW TO APPLY
All application materials must be submitted online through National Fish and WildlifeFoundation’s Easygrants system.
- Go to easygrants.nfwf.org to register in our Easygrants online system. New users to the system will be prompted to register before starting the application (if you already are a registered user, use your existing login). Enter your applicant information. Please disable the pop-up blocker on your internet browser prior to beginning the application process.
- Once on your homepage, click the “Apply for Funding” button and select this RFP’s “Funding Opportunity” from the list of options.
- Follow the instructions in Easygrants to complete your application. Once an application has been started, it may be saved and returned to at a later time for completion and submission.
A PDF version of this RFP can be downloaded here.
A Tip Sheet is available for quick reference while you are working through your application. This document can be downloaded here.
Additional information to support the application process can be accessed on the NFWF website’s Applicant Information page.
For more information or questions about this RFP, please contact:
Program Director, Southern Coastal Programs
For issues or assistance with our online Easygrants system, please contact:
2 Note that landowner contributions being used as match for a Southeast Aquatics grant must be outside of the amount already written into any agency financial assistance contract as a cost-share contribution.